DRINK CATEGORY
1. RC Cola would be in the majority of soda dispensers
2. My father switches his COORS beer for a Pabst Blue Ribbon
BEAUTY CATEGORY
1. 2 in 1 Shampoo and Conditioner is found in most showers
2. People realize shaving products such as wild berry scented shaving gel are unnecessary
CAR CATEGORY
1. The Kia Sephia makes its big comeback
2. The Geo Metro gets re introduced as Kia Sephia's main competition
TECHNOLOGY
1. Acer laptops would be the most requested graduation gift
2. Dial up internet is still slow but now worth it
FOOD
1. Ramen outsells Barilla
2. Jello gelatin becomes America's most popular desert again
PETS
1. Beta fish are more popular than buying a puppy
2. Chia pets become a good substitute for a real pet
IN THIS TYPE OF WORLD:
Products would be the brand itself and the brand names are irrelevant and forgettable
Example: "You have to go check out those neon flip flops they have at the dollar tree."
FORTUNATELY:
People will always desire and feel the need to purchase "the good things in life"
Showing posts with label branding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label branding. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Grand brands are not deceptive
I went to target the other day and was craving something sweet. I came across little debbie 100 calorie triple fudge brownies. This is what the packaging looked like:

I opened the box in the car and I laughed uncontrollably outloud. The product was so small and deceptive it was laughable. In fact, the product shot on the box was bigger than the actual product. The box also shows three brownies. They failed to mention 100 calories was only for one brownie the size of my thumb.

Brands should use impulse buys to jump over one of the major hurdles of brands: getting the consumer to try your product. It is not effective for brands to get consumers at an impulse buy and then disregard them. This is detrimental for revenue because it eliminates repeat customers.
Brands more and more these days are trying to adapt to consumer trends instead of being true to what their brand stands for. If a brand does extremely well at making fattening brownies, then that is where they should put most of their efforts.
Little Debbie's brand promise is unwrap a smile. Unfortunately I unwrapped a hatered for the brand.
I opened the box in the car and I laughed uncontrollably outloud. The product was so small and deceptive it was laughable. In fact, the product shot on the box was bigger than the actual product. The box also shows three brownies. They failed to mention 100 calories was only for one brownie the size of my thumb.
I looked up consumer reviews on this product and this is what the people had to say:
Hungry Girl blog: " The world's smallest fudge brownie. With tiny stripes. In an itty bitty plastic bag. It is laughably tiny. Really, REALLY tiny. Almost a joke. And it's fiber-free. Bummer. Even though this brownie tastes pretty good, it's hard to justify spending 100 calories and 4g fat on something so depressingly small."
Associated Content: "Not only are these brownies small, they are very flat and really, there is not much to this snack. These brownies were a disappointment to me. These brownies are too small. Period. Don't let the name fool you."
And those above reviews were just a few of the many angry consumer reviews I found.
Hungry Girl blog: " The world's smallest fudge brownie. With tiny stripes. In an itty bitty plastic bag. It is laughably tiny. Really, REALLY tiny. Almost a joke. And it's fiber-free. Bummer. Even though this brownie tastes pretty good, it's hard to justify spending 100 calories and 4g fat on something so depressingly small."
Associated Content: "Not only are these brownies small, they are very flat and really, there is not much to this snack. These brownies were a disappointment to me. These brownies are too small. Period. Don't let the name fool you."
And those above reviews were just a few of the many angry consumer reviews I found.
Brands should use impulse buys to jump over one of the major hurdles of brands: getting the consumer to try your product. It is not effective for brands to get consumers at an impulse buy and then disregard them. This is detrimental for revenue because it eliminates repeat customers.
Brands more and more these days are trying to adapt to consumer trends instead of being true to what their brand stands for. If a brand does extremely well at making fattening brownies, then that is where they should put most of their efforts.
Little Debbie's brand promise is unwrap a smile. Unfortunately I unwrapped a hatered for the brand.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
When is it okay to change your logo?

When your brand has such a negative stigma, it can't hurt to change the logo.
If a company is truly trying to change their image, they should take some risks. It would be risky to not change every aspect of their new branding effort. If the brand loyal consumers are truly loyal, they will stick to the brand no matter what font type they use.
Walmart recently just changed their logo from a boxy font to a more feminine looking one. They are also changing the color of the font from a harsh blue to a soft blue. When The Martin Agency gained the Walmart account, they added an emotional aspect to the brand over a purely economical approach. They also did away with the dark blue spiky star in the logo. They replaced this with a soft yellow cheerful sun. Does this now mean that Walmart will make your day more cheerful because you saved a few bucks on your family?
If you could actually feel and touch the new logos, would you rather touch the spiky dark blue star or the soft yellow cheerful sun? Maybe this will pull in some new customers to the store after all. After a few months of this logo transformation it will be interesting to see if their sales and perception increase. The next step is for Microsoft Word to update their spell check option from Wal-Mart to Walmart.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

